Search for: "Gordon v. Gordon" Results 1 - 20 of 2,580
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2024, 1:06 am by INFORRM
On 17 April 2024, there was a costs hearing in Payone v Logo KB-2023-002134. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 4:35 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
” In Seibel v Ramsay (___ AD3d ___, 2024 NY Slip Op 01617 [1st Dept Mar. 21, 2024]), the Court considered the propriety of a $4 million post-trial attorneys’ fee award to celebrity chef Gordon Ramsay under a contractual indemnification provision. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 10:54 am by Amanda Sanders (UK)
The employee, Ms Gordon (G) was interviewed virtually in 2019 for the position of “Second Stewardess” with YMC Ltd. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by centerforartlaw
By Atreya Mathur ​​In a world where creativity knows no bounds and the lines between art, inspiration and infringement blur, one art collective stands at the forefront of pushing these boundaries. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:47 am by Hayleigh Bosher
This review is kindly provided by Thorsten Lauterbach, Teaching Excellence Fellow at the Robert Gordon University in Aberdeen, passionate about IP Law since he studied it as an undergraduate in the mid-1990s at Abertay Dundee. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 3:27 am by Tessa Shepperson
Jonanthan Gordon, a high profile letting agent of Clan Gordon agency has hit out at the government and is now lobbying them saying that these latest regulations have ‘major flaws’ and the time scales are too short to adhere to them. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm by ernst
Bell v Midland Railway Co (1861): The Curious Case of Disputing DirectorsEmily Gordon (University College London, UK)4. [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 8:55 pm by Cameron Harvey (AU)
Footnotes 1 Real Estate Tool Box Pty Ltd v Campaigntrack Pty Ltd [2023] HCA 38 (Real Estate Tool Box v Campaigntrack). 2 Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) (Copyright Act). 3 Real Estate Tool Box v Campaigntrack at [64] per Gageler CJ, Gordon, Edelman, Steward and Jagot JJ. 4 Ibid. 5 Id, [65], [77]. 6 Id, [77]. 7 Id, [88]. 8 Ibid. [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 8:55 pm by Cameron Harvey (AU)
Footnotes 1 Real Estate Tool Box Pty Ltd v Campaigntrack Pty Ltd [2023] HCA 38 (Real Estate Tool Box v Campaigntrack). 2 Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) (Copyright Act). 3 Real Estate Tool Box v Campaigntrack at [64] per Gageler CJ, Gordon, Edelman, Steward and Jagot JJ. 4 Ibid. 5 Id, [65], [77]. 6 Id, [77]. 7 Id, [88]. 8 Ibid. [read post]