Search for: "Government Employees Insurance Co. v. Smith" Results 1 - 20 of 92
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Felix Manufacturing Inc., Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company, Allianz Insurance Company, Defendants, 2023 Cal. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 5:42 am by Kevin LaCroix
” Those kinds of claims are “expressly governed by the Insured vs. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The US experience, as shown by securities class actions such as Owens Corning v National Union Fire Insurance Co [6], indicates that the construction of exclusions is not a simple issue. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
For example, if, in a layoff situation, the clerk having greater seniority than a co-worker employed as a clerk in the same layoff unit is excessed, the typical redress awarded to the individual incorrectly laid off is reinstatement to his or her former position with full back salary and benefits. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
For example, if, in a layoff situation, the clerk having greater seniority than a co-worker employed as a clerk in the same layoff unit is excessed, the typical redress awarded to the individual incorrectly laid off is reinstatement to his or her former position with full back salary and benefits. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 12:57 pm by John Elwood
In government-facing litigation, the government’s petition in Becerra v. [read post]
AMCO Insurance Co. is noteworthy due to the great lengths taken to define a policy provision regarding coverage related to food contamination. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm
This Client Advisory, originally distributed in December 2019, highlights important developments in the law governing employee benefit plans and executive compensation over the past year. [read post]
14 Dec 2019, 10:57 am by Jon L. Gelman
Medical Reimbursement to Insurance Carrier A-68-18 New Jersey Transit Corporation v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Those donors went above the federally established limit by giving to two PACs that assisted in the presidential effort but were not governed by the same rules. [read post]