Search for: "Graham Butterworth"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2013, 4:45 pm
Innovation is a major driver of economic growth. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm
Parliamentarians are still in recess, Lord Justice Leveson has finished taking evidence for Part 1 of his Inquiry, the Michaelmas legal term has not yet begun, but there have been more than enough media law related developments to justify a mid-summer round up, including new dates for the autumn calendar. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am
There have been three resolved PCC cases since last week: A woman vs Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/03/2012; Mr Simon Plosker vs Financial Times, Clause 1, 14/03/2012; Christine Grahame MSP v Scottish Daily Mail, Clause 1, 12/03/2012. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:50 am
The Mirror Group was refused permission by the Supreme Court to appeal its contempt of court conviction for coverage of Christopher Jefferies in 2011. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 7:25 am
SMITH, EDITOR; WITH A FOREWORD BY ANTONIO LAMER Markham, Ont.: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2003 KE448 R84 2003 See Catalog Collective bargaining -- Canada CANADIAN COLLECTIVE BARGAINING LAW / W. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 1:07 pm
SMITH, EDITOR ; WITH A FOREWORD BY ANTONIO LAMER Markham, Ont: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2003 KE448 R84 2003 See Catalog Collective bargaining -- Canada CANADIAN COLLECTIVE BARGAINING LAW / W.B. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 10:55 pm
The current confirmed list of speakers is: Lionel Blackman Solicitor-Advocate Murtaza Shaikh Academic Sara Chandler Head of Pro Bono at College of Law Shubhaa Srinivasan Solicitor, Leigh Day & Co Matthew Jury Solicitor, H2O law Jonny Butterworth Academic and Co-Director of Just Fair Adam Wagner Barrister and UK Human Rights Blog Editor Camilla Graham-Wood Solicitor, Birnberg Peirce Mark A Jones Barrister, St.Ives chambers Martin Curtis Lawworks Jodie… [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Burlington, MA Butterworth-Heinemann, 2011. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
As we said last week, because it’s a Dechert case, we can’t comment directly on Clark v. [read post]