Search for: "Grant County v. Thomas C."
Results 1 - 20
of 343
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Davis, New York City, for New York City Bar Association and others, amici curiae.Powers, J.Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Thomas Marcelle, J.), entered September 11, 2023, in Albany County, which, among other things, granted plaintiff's motion declaring Executive Law § 94 (10) and (14) unconstitutional.In 2020, while serving as Governor, plaintiff sought and was granted approval from the Joint Commission on Public Ethics (hereinafter JCOPE)… [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Davis, New York City, for New York City Bar Association and others, amici curiae.Powers, J.Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Thomas Marcelle, J.), entered September 11, 2023, in Albany County, which, among other things, granted plaintiff's motion declaring Executive Law § 94 (10) and (14) unconstitutional.In 2020, while serving as Governor, plaintiff sought and was granted approval from the Joint Commission on Public Ethics (hereinafter JCOPE)… [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Meehan of the bar of the District of Columbia, admitted pro hac vice and Thomas S. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Meehan of the bar of the District of Columbia, admitted pro hac vice and Thomas S. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 6:45 pm
Lewis v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
As a practical matter, the burden shifts to the party that wishes to challenge the relied upon facts and data to learn more about the cited studies to show that the facts and data are not sufficient under Rule 702(b), and that the testimony is not the product of reliable methods under Rule 702(c). [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am
By Thomas A. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
ATTORNEY’S FEES ■Jose Parra, Applicant v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 2:15 am
She therefore granted a faculty, subject to conditions [63], [64]. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 5:10 pm
Dallas County, Texas 23-97Issues: (1) Whether Younger v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am
The CJEU has said that the extensive use which is made of a mark is relevant to the assessment of confusion in Specsavers v Asda (C-252/12), but I think the judge has stretched that principle too far.Lots of options to read more about this case here.3. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
True, Michael C. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:23 am
" In Regan v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Ricotta & Marks, P.C., Long Island City, NY (Thomas A. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Ricotta & Marks, P.C., Long Island City, NY (Thomas A. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
Ryan (Associate Professor, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) and Thomas J. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:50 pm
Cases 331]; see also County of Sonoma/Health Services Dept. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:03 pm
ShareCivil rights plaintiffs scored a significant victory in Health & Hospital Corp. of Marion County v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has reprimanded Plymouth City Council and Norfolk County Council for failing to respond to the public when asked for personal information held about them – known as a Subject Access Request (SAR). [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 5:08 am
S. ___, ___ (2022) (ROBERTS, C. [read post]
