Search for: "Grant et al v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency et al" Results 1 - 20 of 152
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2024, 10:31 am by Unknown
Oyate Health Center (Tribal Sovereign Immunity) Tohono O'odham Nation, et al. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
In § 6, I discuss an important recent study by Kimberly Rauscher ScD, MA, et al. , entitled “Prevalence of Workplace Violence Against Young Workers in the United States,” published in the American Journal of Industrial Medicine , Volume 66, Issue 6 [pp. 462-471]. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Environmental Protection Agency, to curtail administrative agency discretion.[24] The Court may well take the facts and issues presented in Jarkesy as an opportunity to reduce the authority of administrative agencies, expand presidential power, or both. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
It follows the May 2021 ruling of the District Court of The Hague in Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
A second follow-up case, Steinmetz et al v Germany, was filed in 2022. [read post]
In 2021 and 2022, as the market continued to focus increasingly on environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) issues, government financial regulators across many independent agencies strongly indicated that increased enforcement relating to ESG is on the horizon, while private plaintiffs filed novel securities class actions based on ESG issues. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 4:42 pm by lcampbell@lawbc.com
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released a proposed consent decree intended to resolve the case, Center for Food Safety, et al. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 3:26 pm by Stuart Kaplow
If there is any question about the legal conclusions in this post, a very similar California statute enacted as Assembly Bill 979 was found unconstitutional earlier this year for the same equal protection flaw, in Robin Crest, et al. v. [read post]
”[5] At the same time, the SEC found, such disclosure would “promote the purposes of” the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (“NEPA”), which was adopted months before President Nixon created the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”). [read post]