Search for: "Grant v. Cronin"
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2024, 5:12 am
The Supreme Court should have granted that branch of Geico’s motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss the cause of action for punitive damages against it because “no separate cause of action for punitive damages lies for pleading purposes” (Crown Fire Supply Co., Inc. v Cronin, 306 AD2d 430, 431; see Podesta v Assumable Homes Dev. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am
Nicholas Burns, former undersecretary of state for political affairs; Abigail Golden-Vázquez, vice president and founding executive director of the Aspen Institute Latinos and Society Program; and Amb. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:07 pm
Limited travel grants are available. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 4:27 am
The Supreme Court granted the law firm defendants’ motion, and the plaintiff appeals. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 1:59 pm
” The Court explained that “[g]enerally speaking discovery orders are interlocutory[,]” Cronin v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm
In the 2005 case of Avery v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 11:49 am
”) Cronin v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:38 am
”) Cronin v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 5:30 am
Finally, Patrick Cronin and Seongwon Lee make the case for South Korea to take on a larger role in Southeast Asian security affairs, highlighting its critical interest in protecting the free flow of commerce through the region. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 10:12 am
The case is captioned Cronin & Company, Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 9:42 am
PatLit's David Berry explains the significance of the recent Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruling in Versata Software v Callidus Software on whether patent infringement proceedings should be stayed pending a post-grant patent review. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 11:24 am
Dunson v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Emody v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
Justice Eakin’s most memorable dissent I’m aware of was in Porreco v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
App. 1981) (the “fact [the prescriber] failed to read the package inserts and PDR negates any possible negligence on the part of [the manufacturer] in not emphasizing the hazards in those publications”); Cronin v. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
The court also affirmed the grant of summary judgment on plaintiff's ineffective assistance of counsel claims, premised on 42 U.S.C. 1983 and Monell v. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
The court also affirmed the grant of summary judgment on plaintiff's ineffective assistance of counsel claims, premised on 42 U.S.C. 1983 and Monell v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:00 am
v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 8:16 pm
I was referred to the decision of Cronin J in Charles & Charles [2007] FamCA 276. [read post]
