Search for: "Grant v. Maine Department of Corrections" Results 1 - 20 of 322
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2024, 10:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Danziger, J.), entered June 14, 2023, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted the motion of defendants New York City Department of Education and New York City Board of Education (defendants) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion denied.On October 26, 2015, plaintiff, a special education teacher and dean of a Bronx middle school, was helping students enter the school's… [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Danziger, J.), entered June 14, 2023, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted the motion of defendants New York City Department of Education and New York City Board of Education (defendants) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion denied.On October 26, 2015, plaintiff, a special education teacher and dean of a Bronx middle school, was helping students enter the school's… [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 6:11 am by Jeffrey Randa
For example, the Michigan Department of State (Secretary of State) cannot restore a license or grant a clearance if a person has any open matters in Michigan involving the operation of a motor vehicle. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
On the contrary, all of them apparently took for granted that he was one of the officers of the United States to which Article VI refers. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 5:35 am by Ivo Emanuilov (KU Leuven)
The Hearing Officer at the UKIPO found that the use of an ANN engages the ‘program for a computer’ exclusion and refused grant (BL O/542/22). [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 10:40 am by Amy Howe
There are two main questions before the Supreme Court. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am by INFORRM
 On 1 and 2 November 2023, the UK Supreme court (Lords Reed, Sales, Hamblen, Burrows and Richards) heard the appeal in the case of Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
To the extent that the main or only reason that the Court granted certiorari in this case was to clarify the scope of the Sixteenth Amendment, the Court might well consider dismissing the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 12:46 pm by Kevin LaCroix
” The “main problem” for the insurer, the court said, is that the False Claims Act claims against GRI “were not caused by the professional services provided to borrowers. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 1:23 am by Roel van Woudenberg
A request of the appellant for correction of designation of the applicants for all designated States except the US in form PCT/RO/101 under Rule 139 EPC - which would have resolved the entitlement to priority issue - was not allowed (Reasons, points 4 to 9).10. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Anil Kalhan
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:29 am by Roel van Woudenberg
According to the established case law, in particular decision G 7/93 (OJ EPO 1994, 775), point 2.6 of the Reasons, a Board of Appeal should only overturn discretionary decisions of first instance departments if it concludes that the first instance department has not exercised its discretion in accordance to the right principles or it has exercised its discretion in an unreasonable way.However, even if the opposition division applied the correct criteria in a… [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 3:09 am by Matrix Law
The Judge granted the certificate and the Supreme Court subsequently granted permission to appeal. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:41 am by Eugene Volokh
You can read it in PDF, or below; we still have plenty of time to edit it, so we'd love to see any corrections or suggestions. [read post]