Search for: "Grant v. Newsome" Results 1 - 20 of 228
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
And in cert denial news, we are sad that the Supreme Court will not take up Pollreis v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Newsom—establish a broad understanding of what constitutes impermissible favoritism for secular exceptions over religious ones. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:08 pm
" (Article V, Section 8).I'm quite confident that others knew about this quirk in the California pardon scheme, but I didn't. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Noah Brown
In the arguments, the justices focused little on the facts of the current case, Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 7:30 pm by David Oscar Markus
” Finally, turning to another thorough, learned opinion that doesn’t lend itself to easy summary, Judge Newsom joined Judge Britt Grant’s opinion for a unanimous panel in McDonough v. [read post]
The US Supreme Court announced Friday that it has granted certiorari in the case City of Grants Pass, Oregon v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:05 pm by John Elwood
The most high-profile case of the bunch is City of Grants Pass, Oregon v. [read post]
The judge based his ruling on the two-part test from the US Supreme Court decision last year in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 5:47 am by Russell Knight
“In a proceeding for dissolution of marriage, legal separation, declaration of invalidity of marriage, or dissolution of a civil union, a proceeding for maintenance following a legal separation…the court may grant a maintenance award for either spouse in amounts and for periods of time as the court deems just, without regard to marital misconduct, and the maintenance may be paid from the income or property of the other spouse. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 4:32 am by John R. Byrne
 Check out the Eleventh Circuit's recent opinion in US v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Berger
Newsom stated that a government regulation is not generally applicable if it treats "any comparable secular activity more favorably than religious exercise. [read post]