Search for: "Gray v. Sup. Ct."
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2024, 4:57 am
To succeed on a motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint in a legal malpractice action, the defendant must present evidence in admissible form establishing that the plaintiff is unable to prove at least one essential element of his or her cause of action alleging malpractice (Schoenberg v Dankberg, 2020 NY Slip Op 33133[U] [Sup Ct, NY County 2020]). [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 10:28 am
Sup. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 6:04 am
” Skolnick v Altheimer & Gray, 191 Il12d 214 (2000) Sitting for a depositions is not fun. [read post]
22 Oct 2022, 8:16 am
Sup. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 5:55 pm
Sup. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 4:52 am
In Matter of Straka v Arcara Zucarelli Lenda & Assoc. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 10:22 am
Co. v Mendez, 2021 NY Slip Op 30071[U], *4, 2021 NY Misc LEXIS 85, *6-7 [Sup Ct, N.Y. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 3:48 am
Freeze-out mergers inherently have a disparate impact on a minority shareholder (see id.) and courts have been liberal in permitting them (see Zelouf v Zelouf, 2013 WL 4734873 [Sup Ct, NY County Aug. 30, 2013] [permitting merger to avoid jury trial]). [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 10:31 am
Sup. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 9:02 am
MEMORANDUM OPINION TOM GRAY, Chief Justice. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:23 pm
Ct. 1813) (Kent, C. [read post]
20 May 2018, 8:31 am
Sup. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:29 am
Court Declines Interim Mandatory Injunction Sought by Expelled LLC Member Ho v Yen, 2017 NY Slip Op 32732(U) [Sup Ct Queens County Nov. 13, 2017]. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 5:30 am
Ct. releases reasons in Canadian Artists’ Representation v. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 5:30 am
Ct. releases reasons in Canadian Artists’ Representation v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 5:30 am
Ct. releases reasons in Canadian Artists’ Representation v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 5:30 am
Ct. releases reasons in Canadian Artists’ Representation v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 8:27 am
Ct. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 7:00 am
Surrogate McCarty quoted the decision of Matter of Anonymous (174 Misc 2d 333 [Sup Ct, Kings County 1997]), which described persons acquitted of a crime via the insanity defense as occupying a special class. [read post]