Search for: "Greenberg v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 200
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm by centerforartlaw
Broderick on August 28.[42] Most recently, in an order filed by United States Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on February 12, 2024, the Court addressed a pending privilege dispute over which state’s law should apply to resolve the documents.[43] Another issue was whether the attorney-client privilege between the Estate and its counsel exten [read post]
Contesting the state’s segregationist policy, they took their case (Parker v. [read post]
By: Sofia Ellington On January 18th, 2024, The Washington Supreme Court came to the University of Washington School of Law to hear oral arguments in the case of Greenberg, et al. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by Julia Englebert
This technicality has led to cases as absurd-sounding as United States of America v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Greenberg, represented Jose Sanchez and Antonio Mejia Palacio in an action commenced in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York against, among others, Ethan Sage and Oceanside First Class Roofing, Inc., inter alia, to recover damages for unpaid overtime wages and for failure to provide wage statement notices as required by Labor Law § 195(3). [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 7:13 am by Eugene Volokh
United States (1908) and Indian trust doctrine under United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  But the language of the opinions was often much loftier, as when the Court said, in Wolff v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 8:15 pm by Guest Author
Robert Charrow is a Principal Shareholder of Greenberg Traurig, LLP (Wash [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
In October 1945, during her second year at Columbia Law School, future United States Supreme Court Associate Justice Thurgood Marshall hired her as a law clerk. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 12:10 pm by Lawrence Solum
  Thus, the communicative content of the First Amendment seems to limit its effect to actions by "Congress" (referring to the Congress of the United States), but First Amendment doctrine applies to executive and judicial actions. [read post]