Search for: "Greenberg v. Rose" Results 1 - 20 of 49
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2023, 11:00 am by Aaron Moss
” There may have been just enough verbatim copying here to support an infringement claim, but we’ll never know, as Greenberg Smoked Turkeys v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:53 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The latter rule of law treats material prepared for a client, such as an entity’s owner, as a “property right,” and a law firm has a “general duty to provide that material . . . upon . . . request absent a substantial showing of good cause to refuse client access” (Sage Realty Corp. v Proskauer Rose Goetz & Mendelsohn LLP, 294 AD2d 190 [1st Dept 2002]). [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 3:54 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Notwithstanding Mahoney-Buntzman, Justice Masley continued: ‘[W]hether partnership status is enjoyed turns on various factors, including sharing in profits and losses, exercising joint control over the business, and making capital investment and possessing an ownership interest in the partnership” (Mazur v Greenberg, Cantor & Reiss, 110 AD2d 605, 605 [1st Dept 1985], affd 66 NY2d 927 [1985] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]). [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 8:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Carey National Music Publishers' Association: BMG v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Because the record on equitable estoppel was incomplete, it remanded the matter for further proceedings consistent with the decision.Appellate Divison, Second DepartmentIncome tax liability of the parties is subject to equitable distributionIn Greenberg v Greenberg, ‑‑‑ N.Y.S.3d ‑‑‑‑, 2018 WL 3041099, 2018 N.Y. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Because the record on equitable estoppel was incomplete, it remanded the matter for further proceedings consistent with the decision.Appellate Divison, Second DepartmentIncome tax liability of the parties is subject to equitable distributionIn Greenberg v Greenberg, ‑‑‑ N.Y.S.3d ‑‑‑‑, 2018 WL 3041099, 2018 N.Y. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:03 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Army General (Retired), Thayer Leader Development Group, West Point Douglas Ollivant, ASU Future of War Senior Fellow, New America Gideon Rose, Editor, Foreign Affairs Emma Sky, Senior Fellow, Jackson Institute for Global Affairs, Yale University  Steven Simon, Visiting Lecturer, Dartmouth College    V. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 5:10 am by Jeff Werbitt
Fortunately, the Southern District of New York’s recent opinion – in Greenberg v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am by tekEditor
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. 510 U.S. 569 (1994) 5, 7, 10 Computer Assocs. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 12:20 am
Revenue per lawyer dropped by about 1.6 percent, while profits per equity partner rose by 1.8 percent. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 9:49 am
However, Greenberg Traurig also pointed out the "limited direct applicability to private employers" of the case. * Proskauer Rose explained that the "decision appears to change very little for private employers who wish to review employee communications stored on, or sent through, their own servers and computers" but also (regretfully?) [read post]