Search for: "Grimes v. Grimes"
Results 1 - 20
of 217
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2024, 8:27 am
Beneficiaries can bring an action against a fiduciary who has breached their duty (Matter of Estate of Pirie, 141 Ill.App.3d 750 (1986), (Grimes v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 7:39 pm
The specter of Dunning School history haunted oral argument in Anderson v. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am
Grimes of Iowa maintained that the ban on officeholding “is intended as a prevention against the future commission of offences, the presumption being fair and legitimate that the man who has once violated his oath will be more liable to violate his fealty to the Government in the future. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 6:38 am
Corp. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 5:14 pm
On page 10, Justice Grimes' opinion says: "Plaintiffs argue that fee and cost awards are not mandatory where a plaintiff has dismissed the special motion to strike before it was heard. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 5:50 pm
This post was authored by Richard Grimes, Jacob D. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:38 pm
Grimes v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
Dec. 6, 2022); see also Horwin v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Slater, 888 F.3d 418 (9th Cir. 2018); Kelley v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 7:46 am
State v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 7:45 am
But a court of appeals will be reluctant to overturn a jury’s verdict that a testator lacked capacity.A case from the Houston Court of Appeals, Bracewell v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 2:30 pm
From Collins v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 5:58 pm
UMG’s executives clearly wanted to stake out a strong position on AI during the company’s quarterly earnings call on Wednesday, but legal battles over AI-generated music won’t be easy, and will make fights over the I-iii-IV-V chord progression look downright quaint by comparison. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 1:26 pm
Alan Mygatt-Tauber, Medellin v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 4:17 am
In Armour Pipe Line Company et al v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 11:30 pm
In the landmark decision SEC v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:34 am
" Though not controlling for the purpose of notice or precedent, this case is similar to Grimes v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
The Bradford Hill Predicate: Ruling Out Random and Systematic Error In two recent posts, I spent some time discussing a recent law review, which had some important things to say about specific causation.[1] One of several points from which I dissented was the article’s argument that Sir Austin Bradford Hill had not made explicit that ruling out random and systematic error was required before assessing his nine “viewpoints” on whether an association was causal. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 6:27 am
Grimes, 2022-NCCOA-416, ___ N.C. [read post]
