Search for: "HAMMER v. ROGERS" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2022, 6:14 am by admin
The principal hammer in the authors’ toolkit for detecting misused epidemiologic methods is personal, financial bias. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
[RT: I would say lots of courts in © also try to reduce merger to meaning that you can do anything but copy verbatim, which is a narrowing that many courts in TM don’t bother with, though some variants of Rogers v. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 2:17 pm by Erik J. Heels
Martinez, Alex Verdugo, Xander Bogaerts, Hunter Renfroe, Christian Vázquez, Kike Hernandez, Bobby Dalbec, Christian Arroyo). [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 9:51 pm by Guest
” The widespread and sustained progressive backlash against the more notorious decisions of this era, and the often close divisions on the Court – the child labor case, Hammer v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 11:00 am by John Mikhail
  With unrivaled depth, sophistication, and attention to detail, Schwartz hammers home this point like never before. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 7:54 am by MOTP
" Rogers's affidavit and supporting monthly credit-card statements establish that Wakefield is a cardholder. [read post]
Within a week of Martin’s departure, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell announced that the NFL had retained New York law firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP to conduct “an independent investigation” of what happened to Martin. [read post]
Within a week of Martin’s departure, NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell announced that the NFL had retained New York law firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP to conduct “an independent investigation” of what happened to Martin. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
The tax collectors should too | Jonathan Freedland https://t.co/bqlOn020x5 -> FCA reverses decision on recovery of T24 royalties Rogers v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 11:03 am by Steve Vladeck
Circuit decision–the 2008 ruling in Belbacha v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 8:55 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 As for trademark, I'm hard pressed to see likely confusion, but given how expansive the doctrine has become, you might not even need dilution, unless a court sees this as a Rogers v. [read post]