Search for: "HARMON v. HARMON"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,653
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2024, 2:00 pm
., Goddard v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 12:15 am
Mueller v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 9:23 am
The applicant relied on the AS v Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt judgment of the Court of Justice of the EU (case C‑541/18, IPKat here). [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 4:53 am
In Occidental Permian, Ltd. et al v. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Indeed, the Supreme Court in 1975 in Taylor v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 9:01 pm
In the 2014 Noel Canning v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am
On the same day there was a hearing Titan v Okunola KB-2024-000960. [read post]
21 May 2024, 1:38 pm
In Naranjo v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:55 am
For instance in Tremblay et al. v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:51 am
Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:19 pm
State deficiencies in climate litigations and actions of judges Laurent Fonbaustier / Renaud Braillet 165 Part IV: Cities, States and Climate Change: Between Competition, Conflict and Cooperation Global climate governance turning translocal Delphine Misonne 181 America’s Climate Change Policy: Federalism in Action Daniel Esty 193 Local policies on climate change in a centralized State: The Example of France Camille Mialot 217 … [read post]
9 May 2024, 8:14 am
Read the opinion The post DERRICK HARMON v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 9:01 pm
While the Act does not require the President to impose sanctions on all the persons identified, nor is it likely that the areas of divergence among the lists are not already known, the requirement of a report is clearly meant to increase pressure on OFAC to expand (or, in the Act’s terms, “harmonize”) its designation of Russian oligarchs and others. [read post]
7 May 2024, 10:44 am
Sorry about that, but that's the best way we can harmonize the statute as a whole.But as for the larger epistemological question of what it means to "know" something: well, for better or worse, we're going to have to leave that one for the philosophy crowd.Good luck with that. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:35 am
The court relied on In re Estate of Jurgens, 31 N.W.2d 633 (Iowa 1948) and Noe v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 12:17 pm
Until recently, the leading decision addressing the provision was the High Court decision in Nova Productions v Mazooma Games. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 8:38 am
In a discussion on the interpretation of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule, Judge Restani mentioned her recent decision in Blue Sky the Color of Imagination, LLC v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 5:58 am
Citing the Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:30 pm
Forthrightly, I'm not certain at all that the voters were, in fact, fully "aware" of the way the California treated various prisoners when it passed the underlying initiative (in fact, I'm extremely confident that they weren't), but I understand and appreciate that we pretend that they were when we seek to harmonize various statutory provisions.I just have one question.Imagine that you're a lawyer -- as, indeed, most of you are. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 5:55 am
On February 19, 2024, the High Court in London in R (Al-Haq) v. [read post]