Search for: "HARPER v. HARPER" Results 1 - 20 of 1,648
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2024, 7:46 am by Tabatha Abu El-Haj
Harper Haunts State and Federal Constitutional Interpretation of … Continue reading The post A Justice’s Perspective on Moore v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am by centerforartlaw
Source: USPTO  Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Supreme Court didn’t address and debunk ISL on the merits (as it later did last summer in Moore v Harper), the Court dismissed Texas’s filing on the ground that Texas lacked standing under Article III because “Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another state conducts its elections. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 8:11 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
[On March 15, 2024] the publishers (Hachette, Harper Collins, John Wiley, and Penguin Random House) filed their reply brief on appeal in their  long-running lawsuit against Internet Archive, which challenges (among other things) the practice of controlled digital lending. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
  Take two recent cases, that of Aaron Banks defamation case against the journalist, Carole Cadwalladr, and the actions brought by a number of wealthy Russians against the author, Catherine Belton, and the publisher Harper Collins over allegations in Belton’s book, Putin’s People. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 5:50 am by Preston Lim
Joe Oliver, previously Minister of Finance under Prime Minister Stephen Harper, has argued that the SEMA allows the government to expropriate the assets of individuals absent proof of criminal or civil liability and without due process. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am by INFORRM
IPSO 20762-23 Dale v Telegraph.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation Resolution Statement – 22502-23 Complainant v The Jewish Chronicle, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – IPSO meditation Resolution Statement – 00041-24 A man v Mail Online, 6 Children (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediation Statements in open court and apologies On 20 February 2024, there was a statement in open court in the case of Tayler… [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]