Search for: "HATFIELD v. HATFIELD" Results 1 - 20 of 175
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2023, 11:00 am by Aaron Moss
You may then be wondering why I’m even including Griffin v. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 2:20 pm by David Super
  The same can be true on the Court:  how important was Chief Justice Burger’s joining an already-lopsided majority in Roe v. [read post]
4 May 2021, 8:49 am by fjhinojosa
Barry, John William Hatfield, & Scott Duke Kominers, To Thine Own Self Be True? [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 10:04 am by Giles Peaker
Ngnoguem v Milton Keynes Council (2020] EWCA Civ 396 We’ve seen this prefigured in Stanley v Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council (2020) EWCA Civ 1458 (our note), but the relevant parts of that judgment on late reviews were strictly obiter, as the court had found that there was an agreement to extend time. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 7:03 am by SW
To compare this judgment with such a case, you might like to have a look at Nearly Legal’s article on R(Bukartyk) v Welwyn Hatfield BC (2019) EWHC 3480 (Admin). [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 6:20 am by Gibbons P.C.
“We are extremely proud of Shawn, and we are glad that our department was able to enhance his development as an environmental attorney such that he has been able to succeed so profoundly in public service,” said Camille V. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 6:20 am by Gibbons P.C.
“We are extremely proud of Shawn, and we are glad that our department was able to enhance his development as an environmental attorney such that he has been able to succeed so profoundly in public service,” said Camille V. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 6:20 am by Gibbons P.C.
“We are extremely proud of Shawn, and we are glad that our department was able to enhance his development as an environmental attorney such that he has been able to succeed so profoundly in public service,” said Camille V. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 6:55 am by Giles Peaker
Stanley v Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council (2020) EWCA Civ 1458 A second appeal on the vexed issue of s.204 appeals of late or ‘out of time’ s.202 reviews. [read post]