Search for: "HIGH 5 GAMES, LLC v. MARKS, et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 31
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2022, 5:39 am
A firm might want to deliver high-end advertisements to wealthy neighborhoods, or to deliver coupons when customers enter the mall, or offer a Burger King discount at a McDonald's, or promote farm-related software in rural areas.[5] In addition, online firms seek to segment markets geographically so that they can price discriminate based on differences in wealth or product demand by geography. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am
Hastings Law Journal has a new article (technically a "Note") on predatory lending and the implications of the Second Circuit's holding on federal (non)preemption of state usury laws in Saliha Madden v Midland Funding LLC et al, written by a recent graduate. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 6:41 am
Game Show Network, LLC, et al., No. 15-1187 (is BRI proper for IPR validity challenges? [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:40 am
Game Show Network, LLC, et al., No. 15-1187 (is BRI proper for IPR validity challenges? [read post]
18 May 2016, 8:19 am
Game Show Network, LLC, et al., No. 15-1187 (is BRI proper for IPR validity challenges? [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
District Judge Colleen McMahon rejected Sirius’ arguments that Flo & Eddie Inc, controlled by founding band members Howard Kaylan and Mark Volman, did not own copyrights in The Turtles’ recordings or that Sirius had an “implied” license to play Turtles' songs. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 3:28 am
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.September 1, 2015 - 2 PM: In re PTT, LLC dba High 5 Games, Serial No. 86035890 [Section 2(d) refusal of EMPRESS JOSEPHINE for "game software," in view of the registered mark NAPOLEON AND JOSEPHINE for "Components for gaming machines that generate or display wager outcomes, namely, controllers, displays, button panels, bolsters,… [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 8:11 am
Bass Pro Outdoor World, LLC, et al. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am
Eliminating most patent marking suits and the best mode requirement to name two. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 2:00 pm
Patent Application Pub. 2001/0034673 to Yang et al. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 11:54 pm
Dell Inc., et. al. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 11:54 pm
Dell Inc., et. al. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 6:06 pm
Funai Corporation, Inc., et. al. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 2:59 am
Computer Packages, Inc., et. al. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 9:43 pm
SOCAN and Rogers, et al. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
United States (Gray on Claims) CAFC: Orion v Hyundai on novelty: Expanding the scope of a printed publication with oral testimony (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: False marking includes marking with expired patent number: ZOJO Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
Toyota suffers setback in trademark battle before the Delhi High Court: Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am
Atari Games Corp. et al., 76 Fed. [read post]
