Search for: "HOPE v. JOHNSON " Results 1 - 20 of 874
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2024, 9:11 am by Eric Goldman
As a result of the court’s obvious legal error, I hope this conclusion is appealed, because it’s a good candidate for reversal. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
In the wake of the announced boycott against Columbia University, I posed several questions to Judge Matthew Solomson of the U.S. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am by Matthias Weller
First and foremost, the Johnson Ministry was dedicated to re-access the Lugano Convention[23] which extended the Brussels regime to certain Member States of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA)/European Economic Area (EEA) in its own right.[24] Given the strong resentments Brexiteers showed against the CJEU during their campaign this move is not without a certain irony, as its case law is also crucial to the uniform interpretation of the Lugano Convention.[25] Whereas Switzerland,… [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:32 am by Mary B. McCord
In March, our team at Georgetown Law’s Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection—along with our co-counsel at Law Forward and Stafford Rosenbaum, LLP—settled Penebaker v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm by Ryan Goodman
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
The right mounted court challenges with mixed results for decades, until this June when the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority ruled in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 8:23 am by Eric Goldman
Google Twitter Isn’t a Shopping Mall for First Amendment Purposes (Duh)–Johnson v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 5:50 am by Harold Hongju Koh
He saw a United Kingdom that had “brexited” Europe under Prime Minister Boris Johnson. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Although when it crossed his mind Taft did indeed identify with Andrew Johnson and repudiate the radical Republicans who sought to limit executive power (which included his own father), he nevertheless possessed many reasons to support a strong executive apart from relitigating the racial battles of 1868. [read post]