Search for: "HTC V. IPCOM "
Results 1 - 20
of 51
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2023, 10:21 am
Case in point, the Munich I Regional Court wil hold an OPPO v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 10:54 am
There is no indication at this stage of a settlement with Samsung.In recent years, IPCom has achieved various settlements such as with HTC (after more than 12 years of litigation) and various telecommunications carriers. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 10:38 pm
HTC, both in Mannheim and more than four years ago). [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 4:23 am
This is plainly massive.Hard evidence of OPPO and OnePlus having left the German marketI had mentioned in several previous posts the possibility of OPPO determining that it was too costly to stay in the German market, and then I ran a Twitter search to see whether someone else had also reported on yesterday's Nokia v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 7:01 am
The Neurim v. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 9:28 pm
The IPCom v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 8:12 am
That Friday, the court held a Motorola v. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 1:07 am
Ltd., HTC Corporation vs IPCom GmbH & Co. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 3:09 am
In considering this question, Marcus Smith J considered the case law regarding the stay of proceedings and, in particular, the Court of Appeals judgment in IPCom v HTC[2]. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 12:44 am
Nokia used such a tactic against Interdigital and IPCom. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 5:31 am
In IPCom v HTC [2020] EWHC 2941 (Pat), IPCom sought to plead a similar point but Birss J took a harder line. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 3:28 am
Jane Lambert Patents Court (Mr Justice Birss) IPCom GmbH & Co Kg v HTC Europe Co Ltd and others [2020] EWHC 2941 (Pat) (4 Nov 2020)This was an application by the defendants to strike out part of the points of claim in an inquiry as to the claimant's damages for patent infringement that had been ordered by the Chancellor, Sir Geoffrey Vos, on 17 Dec 2019. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 7:12 am
The patent in issue is a member of the same family as the IPCom patent which has been litigated in the past against Nokia and HTC, but this is the first case in which a member of that patent family has been litigated in the context of 4G rather than 3G, and against a network infrastructure provider rather than a handset provider. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 7:26 am
I am doubtful this is correct, since the skilled person is located in the UK" (referring to Generics v Warner Lambert [2015] EWHC 2548). [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 1:42 am
Following Virgin, the Court of Appeal refreshed the Glaxo guidance in IPCom v HTC [2013] EWCA Civ 1496 (IPKat post here). [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:15 am
Guidance from case lawThe judge reviewed the IPCom v HTC Europe [2013] EWHC 52 (Pat) and Unwired Planet [2017] EWHC 3083 (Pat) decisions. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 10:11 am
by Dennis Crouch IPCom v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 6:38 am
Brian CorderyBristowsby Naomi Hazenberg and Olivia Henry The Court of Appeal has handed down judgment in IPCom v HTC ([2017] EWCA Civ 90), the latest instalment of the long running UK litigation on European Patent (UK) 1 841 268. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 1:00 am
Because all three claims were anticipated by the GSM 04.60 Specifications, the ruling of the PTAB was affirmed (IPCom GmbH & Co. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 2:11 pm
AbbVie also argued that since Arrow was decided nine years ago, the appellate courts have been more willing to permit EPO procedures to take their course without English judicial interference (see Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd v Premium Aircraft Interiors UK Ltd [2013] UK SC 46; [2014] A.C. 160, as summarised by Floyd LJ in IPcom GmbH & Co KG v HTC Europe Co Ltd & Ors [2013] EWCA Civ 1496; [2014] R.P.C. 12.)Carr J… [read post]
