Search for: "Hale v. Scott"
Results 1 - 20
of 71
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2024, 7:39 pm
The specter of Dunning School history haunted oral argument in Anderson v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 1:59 pm
They fought against the passage of California’s Proposition 12, the country’s strongest farm animal protection law, and then its implementation, all the way to the Supreme Court, which decided against them in National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 6:15 am
Since early 2022, Just Security has published more than 100 articles analyzing the diplomatic, political, legal, economic, humanitarian, and other issues and consequences of Russia’s war on Ukraine. [read post]
4 May 2022, 1:06 pm
See generally the non-exhaustive list of factors set out in the judgment of Scott Baker J in R (Khan) v London Borough of Newham [2001] EWHC Admin 589 at paragraphs 8 to 14. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 1:21 pm
The Court did not accept the claimant’s arguments that these passages of Lord Hope and Lady Hale in Birmingham v Ali did not apply to the grant of mandatory relief, or that they were limited to situations where suitability was disputed. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 4:10 pm
In Steel v United Kingdom ((2005) 41 EHRR 22) the Court found violations of Article 6 and Article 10 ECHR. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 6:01 am
Emmerich, and Sabastian V. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 5:10 pm
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: ZXC v Bloomberg, heard 3 and 4 March 2020 (Underhill, Bean and Simon LJJ) Hayden v Associated Newspapers, heard 3 March 2020 (Julian Knowles J) Sube v News Group Newspapers, heard 4 to 7 February 2020 (Warby J) Various Claimants v MGN, heard, 28 to 31 January 2020 (Mann J) W M Morrison Supermarkets plc v Various… [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 3:35 am
Lords Hope and Scott appeared to side expressly with the reasonable period analysis (ie the authority have a reasonable period to provide suitable accommodation). [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 3:35 am
Lords Hope and Scott appeared to side expressly with the reasonable period analysis (ie the authority have a reasonable period to provide suitable accommodation). [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 1:01 pm
Walden v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 3:13 pm
Its consumer brands include Kleenex, Scott, and Huggies diapers. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:55 pm
The committee will hear testimony from David Hale, the undersecretary of state for political affairs. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 2:59 pm
Township of Scott Vacation Rentals: Homeaway.com v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 2:59 pm
Township of Scott Vacation Rentals: Homeaway.com v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 11:24 pm
Question Raised: Which Way Did the Money Flow? [read post]
27 Jul 2019, 4:56 am
District Court for the Northern District of California decision to issue a preliminary injunction in East Bay Sanctuary et al. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 12:35 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California’s order granting a preliminary injunction in East Bay Sanctuary et al. v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 9:06 pm
The agency, however, has reclassified FDA-Approved drugs that contain less than 0.1 percent CBD as Schedule V drugs—an apparent carve out for Epidolex. [read post]
10 May 2019, 4:48 pm
These cases range from ZH (Tanzania) v SSHD [2011] UKSC 4 (an immigration case) and ETK v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 439 through to PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26. [read post]
