Search for: "Hamrick v. Hamrick" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Seyfarth Synopsis: Taking it down to the wire, Governor Newsom approved the vast majority of labor and employment bills that ran the legislative gauntlet, including bills that will expand pay data reporting and pay scale disclosure requirements, extend COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave, create mandatory wages and working conditions for fast food workers, and more. [read post]
Seyfarth Synopsis: Headlining the employment-related bills that passed the May 27, 2022, House of Origin Deadline is AB 85, which extended COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave to September of this year, as well as bills related to accommodations, leaves, retaliation, and workers’ compensation. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
Running The Full-Court Press: How College Athletic Departments Unlawfully Restrict Athletes’ Rights to Speak to the News Media, Nebraska Law Review, Vol. 99, No. 86, 2020, Frank LoMonte and Virginia Hamrick, University of Florida Next Week In the Courts On 14 June 2021 Murray J will  hear the trial in the case of Bukhari v Bukhari. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 3:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The cause of action for fraud accrued between 2002 and 2004 when plaintiffs entered into the allegedly fraudulent transactions (Kanterakis v Kanterakis, 125 AD3d 814, 816 [2d Dept 2015]; Hamrick v Schain Leifer Guralnick, 146 AD3d 606, 607 [1st Dept 2017], affg 2015 WL 5162542, at *4 [Sup Ct, NY County 2015]). [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 5:10 am by Eric Barton
 In reaching its decision, Northern District of Georgia relied upon and quoted the seminal Georgia Supreme Court decision, Hamrick v. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 12:59 am by Mahmoud Khatib
In reaching its decision, the District Court cited the Georgia Supreme Court decision in Hamrick v. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 7:18 am by Howard Friedman
However the federal magistrate indicated that had plaintiff exhausted his remedies the court would have found the denials of Ramadan meals under an all or none policy and denial of a kufi to violate RLUIPA.In Hamrick v. [read post]