Search for: "Hand Trading Company v. Daniels"
Results 1 - 20
of 145
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm
On12 June 2024 the Supreme Court handed down the long-awaited judgement in the case of George v Cannell [2024] UKSC 19. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:19 pm
On the one hand French lawyers might often be unaware of developments in other legal systems, and on the other hand foreign lawyers face serious difficulties to follow French legal developments.For its first issue the FRPL includes a very intriguing set of essays on Climate Change and Public Law, with a great introduction by Jean-Bernard Auby (Emeritus Public Law Professor, Sciences Po Paris) and Laurent Fonbaustier (Public Law Professor, Université Paris-Saclay).The Issue… [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:37 am
A 10b5-1 agreement establishes predetermined trading instructions for company stock (usually a sale and not a buy so not trading the shares) consistent with SEC rules under Section 10b5 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 covering when the insider can sell. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
The FDA’s actions led the drug companies voluntarily to withdraw PPA-containing products. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm
People v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am
On 21 March 2024, Chamberlain J handed down judgement in the case of Sinton v Maybourne Hotels Limited [2024] EWHC 647 (KB). [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 4:32 am
In 2012, Tao solicited Behler to invest $3 million in a publicly traded company Tao controlled called Remark Holdings. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am
MSCHF, which stands for “miscellaneous mischief,”[3] is a privately-held, for-profit art and media company, founded in 2016 by Gabriel Whaley and headquartered in Brooklyn, New York. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am
On 27 February 2024, judgment on meaning was handed down by Lewis J in the long-running litigation between the Dyson Group companies and the broadcasters Channel 4 and ITN, Dyson Technology Ltd & Anor v Channel Four Television Corporation & Anor [2024] EWHC 400 (KB). [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Things can be source identifiers, without being commercial source identifiers (United We Stand): confusion but not dilution actionable Jack Daniel’s didn’t purport to decide the full scope of the “noncommercial” exclusion. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
To the faculty in the room, how do you feel about this show of hands? [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 10:59 am
Q: Veuve Cliquot v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:33 am
Jessica Berch & Daniel J. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:29 pm
Trademark Parody Goods Jack Daniels’s Properties Inc. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 8:07 am
Vidal v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 2:32 am
The “RR/BAYC” NFTs were also made available for trading on the OpenSea NFT marketplace. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:28 pm
And thus the conflict--on the one hand it is of vital importance to continue the development of a viable transnational tort law of business and human rights. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
The hands and dial of a watch are undoubtedly useful, but their aesthetic qualities are trade dress. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
The opinion cites Int’l Bhd. of Teamsters v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
Abitron garnered far less attention than did other intellectual property (IP) cases argued this term, including Jack Daniels Products, Inc. v. [read post]