Search for: "Hand v. State Dept. of Human Resources"
Results 1 - 20
of 42
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:30 am
Dept. of Health & Human Services 23 serve as tactical guideposts. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 5:50 am
From Pinnacle Bancorp, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm
That tribunal had been the subject of widespread and high-level criticism in relation to its fairness and independence, including from the US Dept of State and the Bar Human Rights Committee. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
., Dept of Commerce v, NY, No. 18–966. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 4:07 pm
On 16 February 2021 Tipples J handed down judgment in the libel and data protection case of Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] EWHC 269 (QB). [read post]
10 May 2020, 4:28 pm
On 7 May 2020 Warby J handed down judgment in the newspaper harassment and data protection case of Sube & Anor v News Group Newspapers Ltd & Anor [2020] EWHC 1125 (QB). [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 7:23 pm
This is Part 4 (Data, Discretion, and Analytics in the Administrative State-Economic Enterprise Complex) which considers 2019 as the year that data driven governance, and the legal management of administrative and political decision making became a political, human rights and trade issue. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm
Australia On 18 October 2019 the Supreme Court of Queensland Court of Appeal handed down judgment in the case of Harbour Radio v Wagner [2019] QCA 221. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 6:35 am
But Pennsylvania state law seems to follow the Richardson line of reasoning in, Philadelphia Electric Co. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 8:05 am
Just as I was wrapping up this Quick Hits blog the Sixth Circuit handed down its decision in Brintley v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 7:21 pm
And the state, either as the traditionally conceived apex of political order, or as the repository of large aggregations of power within an international state system, now serves as a (but not the) nexus point for the regulatory power of technique. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 6:31 am
In May or June 2009, Suri states that she complained to the human resources manager that Cirullo pulled her on and off projects and left her with no resources on one project. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:30 am
Dixon purchased me I put all the aforementioned notes in his hands. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 4:31 pm
While on unemployment I took tests for NYS and was offered a position by the State Fund. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
If, on the other hand, the plan is "self-insured" (that is, if the employer itself is ordinarily responsible for payments), the Department of Labor would then inform the plan's third-party administrator (if any) that it is now obliged to offer contraceptive coverage--initially from its own resources--to the organization's employees (and/or students) without imposing any cost-sharing requirements on the eligible organization, its insurance plan, or its… [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 7:26 am
The petitioner in Solla brought suit to enforce an administrative decision previously entered by the New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance (OTDA), which had ordered the New York City Human Resources Administration (HRA) to restore the petitioner’s shelter allowance. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 9:00 pm
Hobby Lobby), explains how the RFRA formula relates to its prior free exercise doctrine as follows: RFRA was enacted three years after our decision in Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
