Search for: "Hand v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 15,417
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2024, 3:09 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
A lot of countries have been able to figure out ways to make it so that all women are in safe hands when it comes to having a baby and after giving birth. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:32 am by Guest Author
This was the position clearly taken by the Court in 1940, in United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 2:56 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
[Old Mutual Unit Trust Managers Limited v Living Hands (Pty) Ltd [2024] ZASCA 75] https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZASCA/2024/75.html [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 8:15 am by Ronald Mann
Dodd-Frank added a provision that says that such a  law is preempted “only if” it “prevents or significantly interferes with the exercise by the national bank of its powers,” and goes on to specify that courts are to apply “the legal standard for preemption in the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Barnett Bank [v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am by INFORRM
Wikileaks founder Julian Assange has won a bid to bring an appeal against his extradition to the United States. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am by John Elwood
Gender-affirming care Three of the cases involve constitutional challenges brought against state prohibitions on providing gender-affirming care to minors: United States v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:17 am by INFORRM
As a means of invading privacy, a photograph is particularly intrusive” (Douglas v Hello! [read post]
23 May 2024, 2:52 pm by John Hempill and Karl Buhler
This is an issue that actually dates back to the seminal 2005 ruling of the United States Court of Appeals of the Second Circuit in Consolidated Edison, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 5:27 am by Jacob Ford Ridgeway
Adding to this constriction of avenues for environmental regulation is the rights of corporations to engage in political speech, following the 2010 decision Citizens United v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:17 am by Phil Dixon
§ 1326 makes it a crime to re-enter the United States after having been removed, deported, or denied entry. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:22 am by Kalvis Golde
United States as inconsistent with the Sixth Amendment as understood in Apprendi and its progeny. [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:24 am by Tom Dannenbaum
Warrants would also provide the focal point for political and legal mobilization in third states, including the United States, making it harder to sustain military aid to Israel. [read post]