Search for: "Harder v. Kelly" Results 1 - 20 of 65
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2023, 1:06 pm by Chris Castle
Recall that one of the AI first class actions was brought by graphic artists against–wait for it–Stable Diffusion and Midjourney (Sarah Andersen, Kelly McKernan, and Karla Ortiz Music v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 5:16 am by Roger Parloff
Though seditious conspiracy carries a 20-year maximum penalty, all of the Oath Keeper defendants were convicted of multiple felonies, so the government seeks consecutive sentences in the cases of Rhodes and defendant Kelly Meggs to achieve its recommended 25- and 21-year overall terms for them. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 12:16 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Abie’s Irish Rose/The Cohens and the Kellys. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Today's essay will focus on the second point, harnessing evidence from an order the Court issued yesterday in Ward v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Mike Kelly brought slates of fake electors to his office, a claim that was immediately disputed. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal DeJoy Maintains Financial Ties to Former Company as USPS Awards It New $120 Million Contract MSN – Jacob Bogage (Washington Post) | Published: 8/6/2021 The U.S. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Efforts to impose rental car excise taxes onto peer-to-peer car sharing arrangements increases the harm of these taxes and will make it harder for the travel industry to recover from the pandemic. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 2:00 am by Donald Kudler
Kelly, 99 Nev. 774, 671 P.2d 29 (1983) https://cite.case.law/nev/98/99/ Perez v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 2:00 am by Donald Kudler
Kelly, 99 Nev. 774, 671 P.2d 29 (1983) https://cite.case.law/nev/98/99/ Perez v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 2:00 am by Donald Kudler
Kelly, 99 Nev. 774, 671 P.2d 29 (1983) https://cite.case.law/nev/98/99/ Perez v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
Amy Howe analyzes yesterday’s argument in Kelly v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:33 am by Peter Groves
The Trade Union Congress was influential in getting them included in the Act, and my friend Lord Lloyd of Kilgerran took the leading role (I think) in piloting them through Parliament, but they hardly ever deliver for the employee-inventor (Kelly and Chiu v GE Healthcare [2009] EWHC 181 (Pat) being the single swallow that could not make a summer). [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 6:24 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
(discussing the doctrine of foreign equivalents in the context of denying registration for geographically deceptively misdescriptive marks); see also Palm Bay Imports v. [read post]