Search for: "Harms v. Bennett"
Results 1 - 20
of 292
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2024, 7:10 am
The Cyberleagle blog has published Part 5 of its series of reflections on Ofcom’s Illegal Harms Consultation under the Online Safety Act. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 2:00 am
On 2 July 2024, there was a hearing in Organista v Rodrigues QB-2021-003806. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 12:05 am
On 28 June 2024, judgment on the need for a Trial of Preliminary Issues (TPI) on serious harm was handed down in Versi v Husain [2024] EWHC 1672 (KB). [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am
On Thursday 16 May 2024 there will be an injunction application in the privacy case of Department for Education v Hercules KB-2024-000389 Reserved judgements Harrison v Cameron, heard 26 March 2024 (Steyn J) BW Legal Services Limited v Trustpilot, heard 7 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Unity Plus Healthcare Limited v Clay and others, heard 1 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Vince v Associated Newspapers, heard 19 February 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini… [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 1:10 pm
The orthodox U.S. constitutional response to harmful speech, including false speech, is counterspeech. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am
Trump’s legal action against ABC alleged that Stephanopoulos’s statement were “false, intentional, malicious and designed to cause harm. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am
There was no sign in the evidence that the Claimant has a case on serious reputational harm which meets the statutory threshold and has a real prospect of succeeding. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am
The Clean Up the Internet Blog has formed some provisional reflections on Ofcom’s consultation for its proposed regime to tackle illegal harms. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:45 am
The Bill seeks to protect minors from online harms by requiring social media companies to prioritise children’s safety in product design and offer more robust parental control tools. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm
Collins Rice J found that the allegations of being a paedophile had caused serious harm to both Blake and Seymour. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 3:46 am
The California Court of Appeal recently decided Bennett v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am
The Court of Appeal considered the question of whether any individual publication of an imputation with a reputationally harmful tendency can be sued upon in the absence of proof that the particular publication actually caused serious harm to reputation. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
Whilst anonymity on the Internet can be used as a cloak behind which to harm others by unlawful acts, not all anonymous speech is of this character. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:15 am
The council’s goal is to “foster a more consistent global dialogue about where surveillance and government access could pose a risk of harm. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am
’ In a statement, McDonald said “Mr Clarkson’s statement is highly defamatory and caused serious harm to my reputation. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 1:26 pm
Trademark: In Jack Daniel’s v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:03 am
This latest ruling raises questions about who is responsible for harmful online speech. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:51 pm
On the same day there was a hearing in the data protection case of Bennett -v- Equifax Ltd. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
New research indicates that human moderators can be an effective way to reduce and control harmful online content. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 8:19 pm
Chapman v. [read post]
