Search for: "Harms v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 25,675
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2024, 10:12 am by Katitza Rodriguez
Domestic Spying Powers and Domestic Safeguards The Convention grants extensive domestic surveillance powers to gather evidence for any crime, accompanied by minimal and insufficient safeguards, many of which do not even apply to its chapter on cross-border surveillance (Chapter V). [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:03 pm by John Elwood
Facebook warned investors that if third parties improperly accessed or disclosed user data, Facebook could suffer business harm. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 1:34 pm by melody
They argue that this move not only violates his constitutional rights but also perpetuates harmful racial biases and misunderstands the nature of artistic expression. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 1:34 pm by melody
They argue that this move not only violates his constitutional rights but also perpetuates harmful racial biases and misunderstands the nature of artistic expression. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 1:34 pm by melody
They argue that this move not only violates his constitutional rights but also perpetuates harmful racial biases and misunderstands the nature of artistic expression. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 5:50 am by Michael Oykhman
In general, the best defences are: Legitimate Reasoning & No Undue Harm Section 163.1(6) of the Code states that if the material in question was produced for a legitimate reason related to the administration of justice, science, medicine, education or art; and it does not pose an undue risk of harm to minors, then you cannot be convicted. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:32 am by Guest Author
This was the position clearly taken by the Court in 1940, in United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:26 am by Tobin Admin
Accordingly, the Court of Appeals affirmed the state court’s grant of the motion on the claims against the police officer’s individual capacity as he was entitled to qualified immunity. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 5:51 am by Melissa Stewart
It also found that States have specific obligations to ensure that greenhouse gas emissions within their jurisdiction and control do not cause transboundary harm. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 3:47 am by Michael Oykhman
The case of R v ML, 2021 NBCA 27 also stated that the actus reus is made out where a “reasonable person aware of the circumstances would perceive the words as a threat of death or bodily harm”. [read post]