Search for: "Harp v. Harp" Results 1 - 20 of 163
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Accordingly, the Court said DOC's decision to terminate Petitioner's employment was not an abuse of discretion considering the severity of Petitioner's conduct, which created "a needless risk of serious injury to the inmate" and, citing Matter of Harp v New York City Police Dept., 96 NY2d 892, held that the penalty imposed does not shock one's sense of fairness, "notwithstanding [Petitioner's] lack of disciplinary record. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Accordingly, the Court said DOC's decision to terminate Petitioner's employment was not an abuse of discretion considering the severity of Petitioner's conduct, which created "a needless risk of serious injury to the inmate" and, citing Matter of Harp v New York City Police Dept., 96 NY2d 892, held that the penalty imposed does not shock one's sense of fairness, "notwithstanding [Petitioner's] lack of disciplinary record. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:14 pm by Anna E. Bullock
In July 2021, the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in National Collegiate Athletic Association v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:24 pm by Dennis Aftergut
Voters have consistently rebelled against the Supreme Court’s June 2022 Dobbs decision overturning Roe v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm by Guest Author
   Take another example: the Clean Power Plan overturned by the Supreme Court in West Virginia v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Can this Constitution be Saved? [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 5:15 am by Florian Mueller
"In a way, Snapchat "deserved" it as its CEO attempted to help Apple on the last day (apart from closing argument) of last year's Epic Games v. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 4:16 am by SHG
Most anti-abortion people are hung up on the question of whether Roe v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 8:01 am by Katrina Eiland
 PACR/HARP, Trump policies that hold asylum seekers in crowded, unsanitary Border Patrol facilities that unlawfully block access to lawyers during their initial screening interview, depriving people of basic due process and a fair chance at asylum. [read post]