Search for: "Harrison v. Christopher, et al"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm
It is a common refrain, mostly on the political right, that considering environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) factors when investing is probably illegal.[1] The basis for this argument derives from the fiduciary duty of loyalty and its corollary, the “sole interest” or “exclusive benefit” rule, enshrined in both federal and state law, which prohibits fiduciaries from investing for any purpose other than the financial well-being of the beneficiary. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 7:51 am
With the passage and enactment of The Harrison Narcotics Tax Act of 1914, the government weighed in for the first time to regulate and tax the production, importation and distribution of opiates and coca products.[5] II. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 2:23 pm
PEARCE ET AL. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:43 pm
Rev. 835-889 (2010).ENVIRONMENTAL LAW.Deatherage, Scott D., et al. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 3:26 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Christopher Miller v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 11:23 am
In Julie Moore Walker, et al v. [read post]