Search for: "Hartzog v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 30
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am
The hospital’s chief executive stated that “all appropriate regulatory and disciplinary steps will be taken and Kensington Palace confirmed that the report was “a matter for the London Clinic. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
Solove and Woodrow Hartzog, Breached! [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am
United States On 15 March 2023, the Colorado Attorney General’s Office finalised the rules implementing the Colorado Privacy Act. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am
On 20 December 2022, Chamberlain J heard costs applications in Wright v McCormack. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
Trade Comm’n, Equifax to Pay $575 Million as Part of Settlement with FTC, CFPB, and States Related to 2017 Data Breach (July 22, 2019), https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press- releases/2019/07/equifax-pay-575-million-part-settlement-ftc-cfpb-states-related-2017-data-breach. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 4:06 pm
United States Last week, President Biden established the White House Task Force to Address Online Harassment and Abuse, which appears will be focusing particularly on online harms which “disproportionately affect women, girls, people of colour and LGBTQI+ individuals” with “technology-facilitated gender-based violence” its top priority. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm
On 1 March 2022 Nicklin J heard an application in the case of SMO v Tik Tok Inc. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 11:36 am
Kurup posted the unanimous court decision in FBI v. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm
The report, a first of its kind, found that existing surveillance law is being eroded by six factors: the introduction of new laws that expand state surveillance powers; lack of legal precision and privacy safeguards in existing surveillance legislation; increased supply of new surveillance technologies that enable illegitimate surveillance; state agencies regularly conducting surveillance outside of what is permitted in law; impunity for those committing illegitimate acts of… [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 3:42 pm
With respect to data security, there are few more useful and concise statements than the “Charney Theorem,” which states: “there’s always a percentage of the population up to no good. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm
Rothman, Loyola Law School, Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles; Yale Information Society Project, Yale Law School The Inconsentability of Facial Surveillance, 66 Loyola Law Review 101 (2019), Evan Selinger, Rochester Institute of Technology – Department of Philosophy, Woodrow Hartzog, Northeastern University School of Law and Khoury Colle [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm
Ben Stokes v The Sun: gross intrusion or simple reportage? [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 4:29 pm
United States Stanford’s Cyberlaw Blog has considered how the FTC can help safeguard privacy rights with legislative mandates from Congress. [read post]
17 Aug 2019, 5:06 am
Emma DiNapoli and Jacques Singer-Emery chronicled the latest developments of the military commission in United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 12:09 pm
Emma DiNapoli and Jacques Singer-Emery described the latest developments of the military commission in United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 8:20 am
As a proponent of baseline federal privacy legislation, I am encouraged that proposals that would have been poison not long ago, such as individual rights to see, correct and delete data as well as new authority for the Federal Trade Commission, are drawing wide support now. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 2:14 pm
Implied, but insufficiently stated in the article, is the fact that the “mindfulness technology” was invented by humans, in order to address a perceived market for tools to help resist distractions. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 4:16 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 15 December 2017 Chaney J handed down judgment in the case of Rayney v State of Western Australia [2017] WASC 367. [read post]
4 Mar 2017, 4:34 pm
Julian Assange reportedly stated that this strategy was at the root of his efforts with WikiLeaks which, ironically, he aimed at “authoritarian” political parties.[3] Such publication can also undermine rule of law by reinforcing an ends-justify-the means value system. [read post]
22 May 2016, 4:05 pm
” Woodrow Hartzog has published an article saying why it is not okay for researchers to scrape information from websites in this way, and why there is no such thing as “public data. [read post]
