Search for: "Heller v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 856
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2024, 11:58 am
In an unusual move, the United States filed a brief supporting further review. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am
Heller and [New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v.] [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:30 am
In the United States, however, the Alaska high court decision became an anomaly, not a trendsetter. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 6:52 pm
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
In Hunter v. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 12:05 pm
Against this backdrop, we should be granting Pennsylvania's petition for en banc review, supported by 17 other states and the District of Columbia as amici, or at least holding it c.a.v. pending the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 8:16 am
From Fink v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 3:01 am
” While the Supreme Court in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 1:41 pm
Babak Sarani, et al., Wounding Patterns Based on Firearm Type in Civilian Public Mass Shootings in the United States, 228 J. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 1:30 pm
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California, in Heller v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 3:37 am
But bad as we may sincerely, even correctly, believe some of these decisions to be, they are still the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
Furthermore, Story would expressly engage in a discussion of the Constitution's "officers of the United States"-language and "office under the United States" three sections later: in Section 791. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:13 pm
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:30 pm
Note: Compare with Dick Heller of Heller v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 8:20 pm
On February 7, the Supreme Court of Hawai'i decided State v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:56 am
On Wednesday, in State v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am
For example, Lash, in discussing the question of ratifiers' views on "whether Section Three applied to future insurrections," states (at 45) that "[v]ery few ratifiers specifically addressed" the question, but those who did "came to different conclusions" on this point. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The Positions Clause [1] employs the catch-all term “office, civil or military, under the United States,” whereas the Officials Clause [2] uses the catch-all term “officer of the United States. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
