Search for: "Henkell v. Henkell" Results 1 - 20 of 99
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2023, 9:10 am by Marcel Pemsel
However, the assessment of the inherent distinctive character of a sign must be made only by reference to the goods and services and the perception of the sign in question (Henkel v OHIM, C-456/01 P at para. 35). [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 1:28 am by Léon Dijkman
The aforementioned study by Henkel and Zischka likewise suggests that less than half of patents is upheld as granted. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 4:27 am by Dan Filler
Blockchain and Artificial Intelligence)• Communications and cooperation between courts across borders• UNCITRAL Working Group V discussions and updates• Hot topics and works-in-progress Please note that the above list of topics is not exclusive. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 12:38 pm by Florian Mueller
Fortunately, all the speakers who used slides have provided them to me by now and authorized their publication.I'll also do a follow-up in the form of a summary (with some soundbites).Now, let me provide links to the slide decks in the chronological order of the presentations:Dave Djavaherian, PacTechLaw: Access to FRAND Licenses Under the Contract LawsProfessor Joachim Henkel, Technical University of Munich: Patent royalties in the IoT industry: an economics perspectiveEric Stasik,… [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 9:06 am
In addition, the court recalled the CJEU decision in Henkel to point out that the container of Tic Tac comfits is not the shape of the product. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:35 am
Teresa Stanek Rea and Professor Colleen V. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 6:57 am by Florian Mueller
Koh's findings of fact, conclusions of law, and remedial ordersJay Jurata (Partner, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe)Licensing practitioner's perspective on fallout from FTC v. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 12:30 pm by Linda Friedman Ramirez
Judge Rosenbluth noted that without the latter, posting of property alone would have been inadequate.[6] The Court cited Wright v Henkel for the proposition that pretrial release in foreign extradition cases is generally not appropriate.[7] However, Wright v Henkel is also known for having created the judicial concept of “special circumstances. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 12:30 pm by Linda Friedman Ramirez
Judge Rosenbluth noted that without the latter, posting of property alone would have been inadequate.[6] The Court cited Wright v Henkel for the proposition that pretrial release in foreign extradition cases is generally not appropriate.[7] However, Wright v Henkel is also known for having created the judicial concept of “special circumstances. [read post]