Search for: "Hennings v. Hennings"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,012
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2024, 6:00 am
Decades later, we affirmed a compensation award to an employee assaulted by a man "he had never previously seen," because under the WCL § 21 (1) presumption, "[w]hen an injury is sustained in the course of employment it will be presumed, as a matter of law, that it did arise out [*2]of the employment" (Slade v Perkins, 42 AD2d 667, 668 [1973], affd 33 NY2d 988 [1974]). [read post]
23 May 2024, 6:00 am
Decades later, we affirmed a compensation award to an employee assaulted by a man "he had never previously seen," because under the WCL § 21 (1) presumption, "[w]hen an injury is sustained in the course of employment it will be presumed, as a matter of law, that it did arise out [*2]of the employment" (Slade v Perkins, 42 AD2d 667, 668 [1973], affd 33 NY2d 988 [1974]). [read post]
22 May 2024, 7:03 am
From Luke v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:17 am
Under Illinois v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:06 am
Shugerman, SEC v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:37 pm
ShareSmith v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 4:10 am
In Mahmoud v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 2:47 pm
Certiorari was not granted in McClinton v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:44 am
Johnson v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 9:08 am
Last up is Bufkin v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 5:53 am
Here’s what Henning writes:A correct reading of the ‘Puma-Rihanna’ case (T-647/22) – Five steps to happinessby Henning HartwigRihanna's IG postAttention had been clearly different if it was not Puma but a safety boot, and if the prior art was not from Rihanna’s Instagram account but an agonizingly boring middle-class DIY trade show. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 3:57 am
In Meinecke v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 5:01 am
From yesterday's decision in Meinecke v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 3:59 am
Eureka Chemical Company v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 9:52 pm
The Board of Appeal held that the claimed invention was novel and involved an inventive step.Trade MarksAlessandro Cerri reported on the highly anticipated judgment of the England & Wales Court of Appeal in Lidl v Tesco, which upheld the High Court's findings on bad faith, infringement, and passing off, including the findings in respect of the 'price-matching' allegation. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 7:00 am
R J Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 2:51 pm
ShareJustice Elena Kagan’s opinion for a sharply divided court in Pulsifer v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 2:10 pm
From Gilley v. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 6:08 am
In Moody v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 12:32 pm
SouthState Bank, N.A. v. [read post]