Search for: "Herrera v. United States District Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 65
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2024, 12:55 pm
United States and Kousisis v. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:03 pm
United States, meaning that the court will be making yet another foray into the “categorical approach” to determining whether prior convictions are “crimes of violence” for sentencing purposes. [read post]
31 May 2024, 11:58 am
The district court and the U.S. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am
Raoul, Herrera v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
Fourth, United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 9:28 am
In Herrera v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 11:01 am
US v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 8:04 am
This is a guest post by Izaak Weaver-Herrera, JD student at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law Third-party discovery in the United States pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm
On 14 March 2022, the Supreme Court denied Julian Assange permission to appeal against the High Court’s decision to extradite him to the United State as the application did not raise an arguable point of law. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 1:54 pm
Herrera v. [read post]
31 Jul 2021, 8:15 am
In September 2013 the Eighth District Court of Appeals in Sergio Herrera v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm
Herrera-Garcia v. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 3:48 pm
” United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 5:58 am
Herrera v. [read post]
7 Dec 2019, 7:52 am
Decisions this Week United KingdomGilham v. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 12:01 pm
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida dismissed the case on summary judgment, finding that Ms. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
United States Department of State, (MD NC, Sept. 17, 2019), a North Carolina federal district court dismissed a suit challenging the State Department's refusal to issue a student visa to Colombian resident Jhonier Herrera, a "friend/ religious partner" of plaintiff Shon Ashby. [read post]
28 May 2019, 2:00 am
Facts of Herrera v Wyoming An 1868 treaty between the United States and the Crow Tribe promised that in exchange for most of the Tribe’s territory in modern-day Montana and Wyoming, its members would “have the right to hunt on the unoccupied lands of the United States so long as game may be found thereon . . . and peace subsists . . . on the borders of the hunting districts. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:10 am
At the NCSL blog, Lisa Soronen looks at Monday’s opinion in Herrera v. [read post]
