Search for: "Herring v. Reed"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,092
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:00 am
Citing Schiano v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:00 am
Citing Schiano v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:30 am
” The Court’s decision in Roe v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 10:31 am
The Court of Appeals has rejected a sexual harassment claim, holding that the plaintiff has not sufficiently alleged quid pro quo harassment in trying to assert that the company president was trying to initiate a sexual relationship.The case is Reed v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 10:12 am
Compare Caraballo-Caraballo v. [read post]
Chief Magistrate Judge Saporito of Federal Middle District Court Reviews Assumption of Risk Doctrine
9 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of Hazen v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 12:34 pm
In Reed v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
Reed, 500 U.S. 478 (1991). [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 12:05 am
Her writing has appeared in The New Yorker and The Washington Post. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 11:24 am
Judge Vyskocil is not alone in her views of this kind of pleading. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
In a decision marked as "Non-Precedential" in the case of Kent v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:10 am
Ron Wyden and former Congressman Chris Cox in Gonzalez v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 4:25 am
In the case of Debo v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:33 pm
”[2] A case argued by Murray and attorney Dorothy Kenyon for women to have the equal right to serve on juries inspired Ruth Bader Ginsburg to the point where, when Ginsburg wrote her brief for Reed v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 5:57 pm
February 4, 2024 Trump v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Vance, Trump v. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 12:20 am
But what is of relevance is the reliance that the Deputy Chancellor placed (at paragraph 9) upon observations from the judgment of Lord Reed, in the Supreme Court, in Walton v The Scottish Ministers [2012] UKSC 44, [2013] PTSR 51 (at paragraph 92) drawing a distinction between ‘the mere busybody and the person affected by or having a reasonable concern in the matter to which the application relates’. [read post]
