Search for: "High v. Parks" Results 1 - 20 of 2,970
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2024, 12:55 am by INFORRM
On Thursday 6 June 2024, there was a trial of preliminary issues in the case of Versi v Husain (AKA Ed Husain) QB-2021-004234 before Susie Alegre (sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court). [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 1:48 am by INFORRM
On Friday 31 May 2024, Belfast’s High Court found that sections 12 – 16 of the Justice (Sexual Offences and Trafficking Victims) Act (Northern Ireland) 2022 were incompatible with press freedom and Article 10 ECHR rights. [read post]
31 May 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
And in cert denial news, we are sad that the Supreme Court will not take up Pollreis v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 3:00 am by Yosi Yahoudai
(Brian van der Brug / Los Angeles Times) Ryan King, a spokesman for the office of the University of California’s president, Michael V. [read post]
22 May 2024, 7:03 am by Eugene Volokh
Luke dated [defendant Jeffrey] Schwartz's daughter, Emma Schwartz …, … while they were both 17-year-olds attending Park City High School in Park City Utah. [read post]
In its verdict, the top court overturned the decision of the KMC to acquire private land at Narkeldanga North Road to construct a public park. [read post]
17 May 2024, 1:07 pm by John Ross
Security guard at a high-crime Des Moines, Iowa apartment complex calls police after he sees a vehicle moving about very late at night to various places where it's illegal to park, with a passenger swinging a gun around. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am by INFORRM
On Thursday 16 May 2024 there will be an injunction application in the privacy case of Department for Education v Hercules KB-2024-000389 Reserved judgements Harrison v Cameron, heard 26 March 2024 (Steyn J) BW Legal Services Limited v Trustpilot,  heard 7 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Unity Plus Healthcare Limited v Clay and others,  heard 1 March 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Vince v Associated Newspapers, heard 19 February 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini… [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]