Search for: "Hill v. C. I. R" Results 1 - 20 of 391
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 6:05 am by George Croner
In Section 702(c)(4), Congress specifically exempts Section 702 collection from the court order requirements found in Title I of FISA. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:57 am by Beatrice Yahia
Air Force C-17 to Egypt [were] subsequently transported via ground into Gaza and then distributed by U.N. agencies. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am by Eleonora Rosati
The CJEU has said that the extensive use which is made of a mark is relevant to the assessment of confusion in Specsavers v Asda (C-252/12), but I think the judge has stretched that principle too far.Lots of options to read more about this case here.3. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
Ryan (Associate Professor, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) and Thomas J. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:16 am by David Pocklington
He cited Lord Fraser in R v Inland Revenue Commissioners ex p. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
If I am wrong, I will readily note the correction and eat my words, but I am sure they will be quite digestible.[6] 1915-01-15. [read post]