Search for: "Historic v. Dept. of Financial Services"
Results 1 - 20
of 25
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2013, 6:36 pm
(IIT v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 1:01 pm
Dept. of Social Services, and that each of the individual defendants was entitled to qualified immunity. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 11:40 am
The Principal Secretary, Health & Family Welfare Dept, Govt. of NCT of Delhi). [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
., v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
., v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
Dept. of Commerce, Case 1:18-cv-02921 (SDNY, Filed 15 January 2019).* * * C. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 11:43 am
Borello & Sons, Inc. v Dept. of Industrial Relations. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 7:57 am
” June Medical Services v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 10:22 am
[ii] Filippo Taddei, COVID-19’s Historic Economic Impact, in the U.S. and Abroad (Apr. 16, 2020) John Hopkins Magazine. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 1:24 am
The historical reason for adopting managed care with provider lists controlled by insurers was to avert a supposed financial crisis facing the state-run SIIS. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 8:01 pm
Examples of such cases include Chiu v Chiu, 125 AD3d 824 [2d Dept 2015], and Kassab v Kasab, 56 Misc 1213(A) [Sup Ct, Queens County 2017]. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
The Historical Context A. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 3:43 am
In Feldmeier v Feldmeier Equipment, Inc., 2018 NY Slip Op 05893 [4th Dept Aug. 22, 2018], the Albany-based Appellate Division, Fourth Department, over a one-judge dissent, affirmed a decision and order issued by Justice Donald A. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 1:00 pm
Ct. 3249 (1985); Dept. of Agriculture v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
On November 14, 2014, in Priests for Life v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
" The amended complaint avers that the historical background leading to the passage of the Hecht-Calandra Act evinces discriminatory intent.The amended complaint alleges that this pipeline is responsible for racially disparate and dismal results. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
" The amended complaint avers that the historical background leading to the passage of the Hecht-Calandra Act evinces discriminatory intent.The amended complaint alleges that this pipeline is responsible for racially disparate and dismal results. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 11:29 am
Supreme Court Decision, Lingle v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 6:51 pm
Dept. of Health and Human Services, No. 10-2204 (1st Cir. 5/13/12), aff’g Gill v. [read post]