Search for: "Hogan v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 642
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2024, 12:00 am by Lawrence Solum
This question has recently been authoritatively addressed by the UK’s Supreme Court (Lumba v Secretary of State for the Home Department) and Australia’s High Court (Lewis v ACT). [read post]
Larry Hogan of Maryland removed the requirement from state law that prospective gun owners demonstrate “a good and substantial reason” for wanting to carry a concealed weapon. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 4:24 am by jonathanturley
” Likewise, CNN senior editor Fuzz Hogan described Young as “a shit. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 6:06 am by Jeff Welty
The Supreme Court’s big Second Amendment case this term was United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 1:42 am by Eleonora Rosati
The IPKat has received and is pleased to host the following guest contribution by Katfriend Patricia Trofin (Hogan Lovells), commenting on a recent decision of the EU General Court on the elusive concept of bad faith in trade mark law. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:50 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Ada Nourell (Hogan Lovells) was on hand and delivered an excellent, prompt report on the evening's events (but you know Kats, they do things in their own time....). [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:24 pm by Chuck Cosson
However, IP ownership related to AI-generated content under United States law is still in flux. [14] Hogan Lovells goes on to note that, because issues are in flux, the rights enforceable under a contract may not be enforceable against the world, i.e., non-parties to the contract. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:24 pm by Chuck Cosson
However, IP ownership related to AI-generated content under United States law is still in flux. [14] Hogan Lovells goes on to note that, because issues are in flux, the rights enforceable under a contract may not be enforceable against the world, i.e., non-parties to the contract. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 1:41 pm by David Kopel
A few days after the Supreme Court decided New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 12:31 pm
And it may be good for business--the business of economic enterprises, as well as of the apparatus of the state and that of civil society. [read post]