Search for: "Hollinger, Inc. v. Hollinger International" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2014, 10:45 am
LSUC dismissal of disciplinary proceedings against Beth DeMerchant and Darren Sukonick.The reasons issued by the LSUC for finding Beth DeMerchant and Darren Sukonick had not been in a conflict of interest when representing Hollinger International Inc. and Conrad Black during the sale of Hollinger’s newspaper businesses to CanWest, are not especially interesting as a matter of doctrinal law (the DeMerchant decision is here). [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 4:30 am by Guest Blogger
DeMerchant for conflict of interest stemming out of their representation of Hollinger International Inc. and related parties in, inter alia, the sale of Hollinger newspaper assets to CanWest. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 8:13 am
The LSUC is also likely to release its decision in the disciplinary hearing of Beth DeMerchant and Darren Sukonick in their representation of Hollinger Inc. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 1:08 pm by Richard Renner
David Radler and Hollinger, Inc., New Futures Trading International Corporation and Henry Roche, U.S. [read post]
20 May 2012, 10:50 am by Brandon Kain
Most of the evidence was located in the U.S., Hollinger International was headquartered for a time in Illinois, and nine of the eleven parties resided in the U.S., including Black, who at the time was incarcerated in Florida. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Black, which was a Canadian libel case brought by the disgraced press baron, Conrad Black, Baron Black of Crossharbour, against officers and directors of his company, Hollinger International, Inc., who, after an investigation, determined that Hollinger had improperly paid Lord Black millions of dollars, to the detriment of shareholders. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 1:55 pm
-based media company, Hollinger International Inc, like a “corporate kleptocracy”.Black, 67, is currently serving a prison sentence in Florida for fraud and obstruction of justice and expects to be released next month. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:26 am by INFORRM
  The case involves Conrad Black, Lord Black of Crossharbour, who filed six libel actions in Ontario in respect of statements posted on the Hollinger International website. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 11:13 pm by Michael Geist
Breeden, an Ontario Court of Appeal ruling involving postings on the Hollinger International, Inc. website that Conrad Black claimed were defamatory. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 4:55 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
In Black v Breedan, Black brought an action for libel against directors, advisers and a vice-president of Hollinger International for statements posted on the Hollinger website. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 10:06 pm by Michael Geist
Breeden, involves postings such as press releases and reports on the Hollinger International, Inc. website that Black claims were defamatory. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 9:06 am by Simon Fodden
As everyone will know by now, Conrad Black’s six libel actions in respect of statements posted on the Hollinger International, Inc. website will be allowed to proceed in Ontario. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 5:31 am by Anthony Lake
  Canadian citizen Conrad Black, former head of Hollinger International, Inc., and once the third biggest newspaper magnate in the world, was charged in the Northern District of Illinois with diverting corporate funds for his own use and was convicted in July of 2007for "honest services" mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. s 1846, and obstruction of justice, following a jury trial. [read post]