Search for: "Holmes v. Day"
Results 1 - 20
of 663
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2016, 12:37 pm
The article quoted Holmes as saying she intended to file case(s) “within the next 30 days”. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 7:07 am
”) * Vegelahn v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 10:59 am
Pictures, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 4:08 pm
Holmes v. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 6:03 am
From Justice Holmes' dissent in Pahnandle Oil Co. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 7:20 am
Holmes was an astute observer. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 6:39 am
In Svaldi v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 8:56 am
Holmes was such a well-known wit that he suffered from the Mark Twain or Winston Churchill syndrome of having just about any commonplace witty saying of the day attributed to him. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 9:17 am
Facts of the Case In the case of Holmes v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 10:18 am
Many of the Court’s worst decisions are deemed to have been wrong the day they were decided. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 10:18 am
Many of the Court’s worst decisions are deemed to have been wrong the day they were decided. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:01 am
In 1902, President Theodore Roosevelt nominated Holmes to the Supreme Court, a position for which he was confirmed without objection two days later. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
When Holmes got to be an old man, he was said to be the only man living who remembered arguing with John Quincy Adams.[1] Holmes died in 1935, two days before his ninety-fourth birthday. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 11:48 am
National Martini Day (courtesy Bar Louie) June 19 was “World Martini Day. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 12:57 am
Although the courts have acknowledged in Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate that Sherlock Holmes as a character is protectable (within the relevant term), the extent of "roundedness" that could extend outside of the term is very debatable. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 12:57 am
Although the courts have acknowledged in Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate that Sherlock Holmes as a character is protectable (within the relevant term), the extent of "roundedness" that could extend outside of the term is very debatable. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 12:57 am
Although the courts have acknowledged in Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate that Sherlock Holmes as a character is protectable (within the relevant term), the extent of "roundedness" that could extend outside of the term is very debatable. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 12:57 am
Although the courts have acknowledged in Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate that Sherlock Holmes as a character is protectable (within the relevant term), the extent of "roundedness" that could extend outside of the term is very debatable. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm
Harlan’s moral vision is memorialized in his lone dissent in Plessy v. [read post]
