Search for: "Holmes v. Farmer"
Results 1 - 20
of 27
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
The article complained of had said that Neumann “defrauded” investors in We Work and likened him to convicted fraudster Elizabeth Holmes. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
Until relatively recently, Article V and the hurdles it presented to formal constitutional amendment was seen as a feature rather than a bug, especially if one credited the constitutional theories of esteemed scholars like David Strauss or Bruce Ackerman. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm
Harlan’s moral vision is memorialized in his lone dissent in Plessy v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 4:48 pm
Why couldn’t he have been a farmer or a pig-breeder or a stockbroker or anything but a solider?..... [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
Farmers, after all, had been producing better cows, sheep, and horses, by carefully controlling their breeding. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:02 am
He was not able to avoid the issue in Buck v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 8:00 am
Patrick Gudridge, University of Miami School of Law, has posted Past Present, an essay on Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes and Moore v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 8:02 am
Il commence ainsi un duel judiciaire, dans lequel ce qui compte ne sont pas les faits, mais leur interprétation et lacapacité des deux avocats.Ce sera la justicequi gagnera ou bine l'habileté dans la manipulation des évènements? [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
As Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. prophetically stated in his dissent from the infamous 1905 case of Lochner v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am
” The Court denied cert. in June on a very similar issue involving California’s efforts to affect production beyond its borders in Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 11:08 am
Twombly, and Ashcroft v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
TCRR says the Supreme Court seized the initiative for the Civil Rights Movement with Brown v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
TCRR says the Supreme Court seized the initiative for the Civil Rights Movement with Brown v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 4:06 am
As a follow up to my tongue-in-cheek post last Friday about language from judicial opinions I want to mention something that's bothered me for a while now, and see if people think I'm being over-sensitive: the jocular riffing on Justice Holmes's "Three generations of imbeciles is enough" language from Buck v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 6:43 am
See, e.g., United Farmers Agents Association, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:19 am
At any rate it was easily demonstrated that an overwhelming portion of the adult population was already as much engaged in the commerce of the health care system as was the wheat farmer in Wickard. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:24 am
As true conservatives have said for years, if the court could use the commerce clause to forbid a farmer from eating the wheat he grew (See, Wickard v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 12:47 pm
My response to that is to quote Justice Holmes in Lochner v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 6:23 am
” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost views Snyder in the context of Justice Holmes’s 1929 dissent in Schwimmer v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 9:37 pm
This case led to the writ of misfeasance in public office being issued when a police constable prevented a farmer from voting. [read post]
