Search for: "Holmes v. Powers" Results 1 - 20 of 645
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2024, 12:21 pm by Dennis Crouch
Holmes’s duties as a supervisor employed by the Mint. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Indeed, they must be if humanity is to survive and flourish in the face of existential threats.[26] One reason is that the collective power of business to influence some of these large problems is at least equivalent to the power of nations or global assemblages of only governments and nonprofit organizations.[27] Extending my previous descriptive argument in Business Persons prescriptively, business firms are best understood as “real fictions” in society that are… [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" A fundamental assumption of the modern First Amendment is that (as Justice Holmes put it in his famous dissenting opinion in Abrams v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 1:10 pm by Eugene Volokh
" The view that corrective speech is preferable to censorship resonates with Justice Holmes' famous intimation that "the best test of truth is the power of the thought to get itself accepted in the competition of the market. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 3:19 am by INFORRM
Considering all of these cases together, the court seems posed to further promote a robust “free trade in ideas,” which was a theory first invoked in 1919 by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes in Abrams v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 5:16 pm by Tom Ginsburg
The famous Brandeis brief appears around that time, in such cases as Muller v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm by Barbara Moreno
:  Emergency Powers in the Time of COVID (2023). 53. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
That is the legacy of the brilliant Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Post’s new book, The Taft Court: Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921-1930, is the latest installment of the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Consider, for instance, the end of the Court’s per curiam opinion in Bush v. [read post]