Search for: "Holmes v. South Carolina"
Results 1 - 20
of 61
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2019, 9:30 pm
Holmes (1969) played in integrating the South’s public schools. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:21 pm
Holmes, our supreme court noted that a family court judge can award retroactive child support. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:21 pm
Holmes, our supreme court noted that a family court judge can award retroactive child support. [read post]
22 Feb 2006, 7:29 pm
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] heard oral arguments Wednesday in Holmes v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:30 am
All things considered, it appears reasonably clear that Plaintiffs were trying to use the Sherlock Holmes theory as a back-door way of introducing the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur into South Carolina law. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 6:17 am
In the August 15, 2012 opinion of Holmes v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 2:28 pm
State v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 11:50 pm
Moreover, once Goldberg replaced Frankfurter and White replaced Whittaker in 1962, there was a six person liberal majority for civil rights legislation (I should note, however, that one of the six, Hugo Black, dissented in South Carolina v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 9:29 am
Part III analyzes the emergence of the right to present a defense that a third party committed the crime and concludes with a discussion of the Supreme Court's recent decision in South Carolina v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 1:28 pm
In five southern states – Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi and South Carolina – public elementary and high schools remained totally segregated. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 1:38 am
Ginkowski
The Lessons of Injustice, by Roy Black
Holmes v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 9:08 am
Giles, like Buck v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 10:13 am
Holmes v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 8:15 am
Holmes, Holmes v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 6:21 pm
The Court applied the test it previously employed in People v Young (7 NY3d 40 [2006]) for determining whether such a ruling is error: was there was evidence which corroborated the identification evidence.The Young standard in which a defendant’s right to present evidence is conditioned on the court’s perception of the strength of the People’s case appears to be in conflict with the holding of the United States Supreme Court in Holmes v South… [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 1:19 am
.
Holmes v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 9:53 am
South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003 (1992). [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 8:05 am
South Carolina Coastal Council) after a state natural resources agency limited new development in the area. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 7:20 am
In Buck v. [read post]
