Search for: "Holtzman v. Holtzman"
Results 1 - 20
of 92
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2024, 7:57 am
Holtzman, 248 Ill. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 4:23 am
Holtzman v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 2:21 pm
(See Holtzman & Hartinger, Cal. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 2:21 pm
(See Holtzman & Hartinger, Cal. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:00 am
Early in his law career, Sam co-authored Patt v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 6:00 am
In this action brought pursuant to Article 78 of New York State's Civil Practice Law and Rules, the Appellate Division considered the equivalent of two such ancient writs being sought by the Petitioner, a Writ of Mandamus and a Writ of Prohibition.With respect to the Writ of Mandamus the court said that "The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act, and only where there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought", citing Matter… [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 6:00 am
In this action brought pursuant to Article 78 of New York State's Civil Practice Law and Rules, the Appellate Division considered the equivalent of two such ancient writs being sought by the Petitioner, a Writ of Mandamus and a Writ of Prohibition.With respect to the Writ of Mandamus the court said that "The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act, and only where there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought", citing Matter… [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 5:00 am
Citing Matter of Holtzman v Goldman, 71 NY2d 564 and other cases, the Appellate Division explained that "[b]ecause of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court -- in cases where judicial authority is challenged -- acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers". [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 5:00 am
Citing Matter of Holtzman v Goldman, 71 NY2d 564 and other cases, the Appellate Division explained that "[b]ecause of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court -- in cases where judicial authority is challenged -- acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers". [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 8:58 am
She litigated multiple complex labor and employment matters, including the matter of Daugherty v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 9:47 am
With respect to the latter point, one need only look back at a 2018 decision (San Francisco Police Officers’ Assn. v. [read post]
21 May 2021, 6:39 am
” [4] In Pasadena Police Officers Assn. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Holtzman v Griffith, 162 AD3d at 876). [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 11:04 am
Table of Contents Key Findings Introduction Evaluating the Federal R&D ax Credit Effectiveness of the R&D Tax Credit — Does the R&D Credit Increase R&D Spending? [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 6:27 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 6:08 pm
by Partners Linda Ross and Jon Holtzman The long-awaited Alameda County Deputy Sheriff’s case has now been decided by the California Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 7:13 pm
The piece was authored by Jon Holtzman, K. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 6:48 pm
” (Campbell v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 1:11 pm
In Luv n’ care, Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 1:11 pm
In Luv n’ care, Ltd. v. [read post]
