Search for: "Housing Authority v. Rodriguez" Results 1 - 20 of 165
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2024, 8:57 am by Richard Hunt
You can fight Uncle Sam, but it isn’t cheap. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ¹ You can find it at Housing Authority of Grapevine Charge ² See, Rodriguez v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
WCAB panel decisions are citeable authority, particularly on issues of contemporaneous administrative construction of statutory language. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
The LSO obviously has a narrow mandate in comparison to the House of Commons or Legislative Assembly at Queen’s Park. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 2:52 pm by bndmorris
Gonzalez’s review The New Batson: Opening the Door of the Jury Deliberation Room after Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
The Split in Federal Circuit Court Authority There is a split in federal circuit authority about whether paid administrative leave constitutes adverse or punitive action. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 9:49 am by Michael Froomkin
Note that this rule does not apply categorically to a hypothetical negative mailer authorized and signed by a campaign. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Favors v Cuomo, 2012 WL 928223 *2, 2012 US Dist LEXIS 36910, *10 [ED NY, Mar. 19, 2012, No. 11-CV-5632, Raggi, Lynch, and Irizarry, JJ.]; Rodriguez v Pataki, 2002 WL 1058054, *7, 2002 US Dist LEXIS, *25-27 [SD NY 2002, May 24, 2002, No. 02 Civ. 618, Walker, Ch. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Favors v Cuomo, 2012 WL 928223 *2, 2012 US Dist LEXIS 36910, *10 [ED NY, Mar. 19, 2012, No. 11-CV-5632, Raggi, Lynch, and Irizarry, JJ.]; Rodriguez v Pataki, 2002 WL 1058054, *7, 2002 US Dist LEXIS, *25-27 [SD NY 2002, May 24, 2002, No. 02 Civ. 618, Walker, Ch. [read post]
The Act would give the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) the authority to track and charge digital media platforms, such as Facebook and Twitter, for providing access to news content. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 1:57 pm by Andrew Hamm
Mahaffy 21-383Issue: Whether the Supreme Court’s rejection in Rodriguez v. [read post]