Search for: "Howard v. Alabama, State of" Results 1 - 20 of 132
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
Many of the silicone cases were pending in a multi-district litigation, MDL 926, before Judge Sam Pointer, in the Northern District of Alabama. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
Davis (Assistant Professor, The University of Alabama), Brendan Nyhan (James O. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am by Derek T. Muller
Schools most likelty to be harmed include Howard, Oklahoma, Miami, Michigan State, Hastings, Lewis & Clark, Pittsburgh, and Case Western.2. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am by Derek T. Muller
Schools most likelty to be harmed include Howard, Oklahoma, Miami, Michigan State, Hastings, Lewis & Clark, Pittsburgh, and Case Western.2. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
FEBRUARY The Supreme Court restored congressional maps in Alabama after a district court ordered the state to redraw them before holding primary elections in March. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 3:45 am by Kyle Hulehan
Both states saw major increases in cigarette smuggling. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am by Bernard Bell
  See generally, Sheldon Howard Laskin, The Nostalgia of Eternity: Interstate Compacts, Time, and Mortality, 49 Rutgers L. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
Alabama (1935); the duty of fair representation case Steele v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:29 am by ernst
Senator from Alabama, opened an investigation of the Spoils Conference. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings: Excessive tax rates on cigarettes in some states induce substantial black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
First, there is a lot of new material regarding the “loyal denominator” issue (see here and here): whether the former Confederate states were to be included in the Article V total of states of which three fourths were required to ratify an amendment, or whether (as I think) only three fourths of the states represented in Congress were required, because rebel states’ Article V naysaying power, like their Article I right to be… [read post]