Search for: "Howe v. Neal" Results 1 - 20 of 470
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2024, 10:50 am by Amy Howe
” This article was originally published at Howe on the Court. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 7:11 am by Christine Corcos
Neal Feigenson, Ouinnipiac University School of Law, has published Say It With Pictures: Image and Text in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 7:11 am
Neal Feigenson, Ouinnipiac University School of Law, has published Say It With Pictures: Image and Text in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:22 pm by Amy Howe
This article was originally published at Howe on the Court. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
By Suzanna Neal and the Center for Art Law Team On January 30th, 2024, the trial of Accent Delight International Ltd. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:46 am by Frank O. Bowman, III
Republican politicians have embraced immigration as a potent political issue. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm by Carson Turner
Heise and Nance argue that existing literature on school violence too often avoids examining how school funding variations help to explain how schools prioritize and implement crime prevention programs. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 8:59 am by Amy Howe
This article was originally published at Howe on the Court. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 5:49 am by Eugene Volokh
In particular, how can we avoid dozens of Doe v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 12:01 pm by admin
But with 2.1% incidence versus 2.0%, how can compensation be rationally permitted in every case? [read post]