Search for: "Howell v. Department of Justice Services"
Results 1 - 20
of 71
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2024, 1:48 am
Delimatsis, Panagiotis, From TikTok to Uber to the Metaverse: Digital Services, Servicification and Internat [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 4:52 am
”[20] Insider Trading Last year, the Department of Justice (DOJ) brought a charge against a former employee of the NFT marketplace, labeling it “the first-ever digital asset insider trading scheme. [read post]
Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A. // Protecting Privacy and Privilege Rights in Non-Party Requests for Documents
15 Jun 2023, 12:01 pm
” Russell at 745, citing East Colonial Refuse Service, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
The Justice Department opposed the unsealing, prompting Howell’s decision. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm
Procedural History of the Criminal Investigation and the Perry Litigation Perry has been of interest to Justice Department prosecutors since at least June 2022 for his involvement in efforts to overturn the 2020 election. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 4:42 am
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito yesterday called the leak of his draft opinion overturning Roe v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 2:15 pm
Natalie Orpett shared the Justice Department’s motion in the Eleventh Circuit for a partial stay of U.S. [read post]
30 Jul 2022, 6:01 am
Orpett, Peter Strzok, and Benjamin Wittes outlined eight standards to evaluate the Justice Department’s investigation of Jan. 6 going forward, in light of recent reporting that revealed the Justice Department is investigating Donald Trump’s actions in relation to its criminal probe on Jan. 6. [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 9:51 am
Jurecic and Orpett, in conversation with Wittes, argued that the Justice Department is too narrowly conceptualizing its responsibilities and, as such, is failing to do enough to investigate the Jan. 6 attack. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 6:01 am
Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast in which Stephanie Pell sat down with Andrea Matwyshyn to discuss the Justice Department’s new policy concerning how it will charge cases under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act: Pablo Chavez argued that digital sovereignty offers a path toward technological self-determination for democratic, rule-bound governments. [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 1:23 pm
Justice Department Office of the Inspector General’s audit of the U.S. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 1:19 pm
The House voted 220-to-203 in favor of the resolution to refer Scavino and Navarro to the Justice Department for potential prosecution. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 9:16 am
Roger Parloff, Elizabeth McElvein, Stephanie Pell and Benjamin Wittes examined whether the Jan. 6 committee’s recent filing will be enough to push the Justice Department to commence a criminal inquiry of Trump. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 10:15 am
A statement released by the Defense Department specifies that the sale includes engineering services to support the Patriot missile defense system. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 11:25 am
Circuit Opinion in Atchley v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm
Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for a four-justice plurality, concluded that only wetlands that have a continuous surface water connection to regulated waters may themselves be regulated under the act. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 9:03 pm
Supreme Court’s divided opinions in June Medical Services v. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 10:20 am
Deane School of Law joined Lawfare Editor-In-Chief Benjamin Wittes to discuss Meng Wanzhou’s recent deal with the Department of Justice: powered by Crowdcast A new episode of Lawfare No Bull featured testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee from top Pentagon officials about the U.S. military withdrawal from Afghanistan: Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast in which Ronan Bergman joined Benjamin Wittes to discuss the… [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 12:45 pm
The Secret Service, FBI, and Department of Defense all purchased surveillance drones from DJI, a Chinese company the Pentagon has deemed a potential national security threat, according to Axios. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 2:57 pm
Howell (McGirt v. [read post]
