Search for: "Howey v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 122
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2020, 10:50 am
In a closely-watched cryptocurrency case, on September 30, the Southern District of New York ruled in favor of the SEC in SEC v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 6:59 am
ATBCOIN LLC, March 31, 2019, Broderick, V.). [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 5:25 pm
Circuit in SEC v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 10:01 am
Comm'n v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 3:52 pm
Footnotes [1] More recently in United Housing Foundation v. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 12:29 pm
The appeals court explained that the Howey opinion set forth a test for determining if something is an investment contract and, thus, a security, but that Florida courts had used Howey in a logically untenable manner beyond this specific purpose (Githler v. [read post]
13 Aug 2023, 4:35 pm
Yours truly was privileged to co-sign an amicus brief in the SEC v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 8:54 am
In the second case, the State of Texas sought an injunction and other relief for allegations Life Partners committed fraud when selling securities. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 8:54 am
Three relevant quotes from SEC v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 2:36 pm
The SEC and its state counterparts presently apply the Howey[1]/Forman[2] tests set down by the U.S. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 9:10 am
By Lene Powell, J.D.Parts of the recent controversial ruling in SEC v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 5:00 am
As the promissory notes did not meet either the risk-capital or the Howey test for a security, the trial court properly set aside two criminal charges that the defendant used false statements in the sale of a security (People v. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
Howey Co. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 6:20 am
In each of these cases, the threshold issue is whether the digital asset or token is a security, a question that goes back to Congress’s definition of “security” in the 1930s, the Supreme Court’s Howey decision in the 1940s, and the Court’s Reves v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 7:13 am
Last week, in Friel v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 12:01 pm
Said the court: “By stating that ‘transaction[s]’ and ‘scheme[s]’—and not just ‘contract[s]’—qualify as investment contracts, the Supreme Court made clear in Howey that Congress did not intend the term to apply only where transacting parties had drawn up a technically valid written or oral contract under state law” (citations omitted).One can see a progression in crypto companies’ arguments in response to… [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 6:50 am
Supreme Court SEC v. [read post]
11 Oct 2024, 12:15 am
Supreme Court in SEC v. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 6:30 am
Coinseed sold tokens in 2018 to raise money for a mobile app that allows users to round up everyday purchases made on their linked credit and debit cards and invest those round-ups in a choice of virtual currencies (SEC v. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 5:30 am
Howey Co., 328 U.S. 293 (1946)The SEC has stated that cryptocurrencies like bitcoin are not securities. [read post]
